Archives For virtue

In After You Believe: Why Christian Character Matters, N.T. Wright lays out his understanding of how Christian character, or virtue, is formed. While none of us are naturally inclined to live like Jesus, the goal is that as we mature as Christ-ians, we begin to look more and more like the one with whom we identify. Living like Jesus, then, may even seem to be “second nature” eventually. Like his other books, Wright doesn’t exactly put the cookies on a low shelf, though compared with some of his other works (like the ones in this series), he’s trying.

There’s simply too much packed into these 300 pages to try to unpack everything here, but here are a few particularly great quotes from the later part of the book, as the vision of Christian character he weaves begins to take shape. (And for those disposed to view Wright with suspicion, he stays away from controversy here — at least as far as I can tell.)

On what it means to be the people of God:

The task of being God’s royal priesthood in the present, then, is all about worship and mission — a worship and mission which share a heart, the heart that is learning to love God the creator and God the recreator and discovering how to develop the habits that will reflect God’s love into the world and the world’s grateful love back in return… The generous creator God is not honored, is not reflected into his world, by a church that stands aloof, secure in its own holiness, and looking down on the best that the rest of the world can do as so much unspiritual, un-Christian or ungodly rubbish… Precisely because the greatest Christian virtue is love, modeled on that of the creating and life-giving God, the individual Christian and the church as a whole must develop the settled habits of looking out for what’s going on in the surrounding world, rejoicing with its joy, weeping with its grief, and above all eager for opportunities to bring love, comfort, healing, and hope wherever possible. And with all these it may bring faith, not necessarily by speaking of Jesus all the time (though there will be such opportunities), but by living Jesus in public. (pp. 234-235, 237)

On unbiblical (and counter-productive) divides within the church:

The church has been divided between those who cultivate their own personal holiness but do nothing about working for justice in the world and those who are passionate for justice but regard personal holiness as an unnecessary distraction from that task. This division has been solidified by the church’s unfortunate habit of adopting from our surrounding culture the unhelpful packages of ‘left-wing’ and ‘right-wing’ prejudices, the former speaking of ‘justice’ and meaning ‘libertarianism’ and the latter speaking of ‘holiness’ and meaning ‘dualism.’ All this must be firmly pushed to one side. What we need is integration. (p. 247)

How our individual formation of Christian character and virtue is connected to other believers across time and space:

The more we are people of the story, the examples, the community, and the practices, the more we will understand the scriptures, and vice versa. And the more we join them all together, the more we shall be formed into a community, locally, globally, and across time, in whose lives the Jesus habits of faith, hope, and love have become second nature. (pp. 283-284)

Thoughts? Responses?

For twenty years, a political philosopher named Michael Sandel has taught a course at Harvard simply called “Justice.” It’s been so wildly popular that it became the first Harvard course to be aired on public television and available for free online. I just read the bestseller he wrote, Justice: What’s the Right Thing To Do?, which takes some of the key themes of the course and, presumably, puts the proverbial cookies on a shelf low enough for folks like me to reach them.

Drawing on philosophers both ancient and modern, he wrestles through real life dilemmas that happen all around us, and shows that there are three main ways of thinking about justice: justice as maximizing welfare, justice as respecting freedom, and justice as promoting virtue. We hold our views, in many cases, with unexamined and unarticulated assumptions, which goes a long way in explaining why political and social debates often turn so nasty, even among people who generally like each other.

Of today’s most divisive issues, Sandel says: “Lying just beneath the surface, with passions raging on all sides, are big questions of moral philosophy, big questions of justice. But we too rarely articulate and defend and argue about those big moral questions in our politics.”

Sandel says that most political discourse — in mass media especially — pits the welfare camp against the freedom camp. You probably know with which of the two camps you generally align. But he proposes a version of the third view of justice, that of promoting virtue. I won’t go into detail explaining what he means by that; you’ll need to read the book. Or better yet, take the course!

Here Sandel introduces some of the themes he covers in the book, using a fascinating golf quandary as his case study.