
So far in this series we’ve taken a look at what Christian community development is, emphasizing the so-called “three Rs”: relocation, reconciliation and redistribution. We have also considered the marks of an authentic church, the kind of church that would make Christian community development possible.
Now we turn to the important role of the urban environment that many find themselves in. Perkins says that over the years he has learned that “it is difficult to be salt and light if we ignore the concrete realities of people’s environment.” So what are some of the important factors at play in underdeveloped urban contexts? And what can be done to enrich communities in each of these ways, so that development is possible? Before we take a look at eight factors, Perkins advises us to remember that “local leadership is the most important sign that long-term community development is taking place."
1. Dignity. Theologically, it is true to say that all of us have equal dignity because all of us are made in the image of God. But generational patterns of dehumanization (whether from the outside or within) can convince the rich and poor alike that some are more dignified than others. By encouraging a healthy sense of pride in one’s cultural and even ethnic background -- all in the context of who we are in the eyes of God -- and by emphasizing the importance of the place in which one lives, dignity can slowly be restored.
2. Power. The urban poor experience powerlessness in many ways, often unrecognizable to the wealthy and middle classes, and certainly beyond much of our understanding. It’s not surprising that many poor people are suspicious of those with power, because it has so often served them so negatively. Perkins does not suggest a combative response to those with power, but rather collaboration for the sake of the powerless. Power can be life-giving when it’s in the right hands.
3. Education. The crisis is two-sided: the quality of education available in inner cities is generally terrible, and people in inner cities are increasingly not seeing the value in education. Which causes which is hard to say, but it’s a real crisis with real ramifications. Perkins promotes the incalculable value of after-school tutoring as well as encouraging teachers and parents to hear from each other. This would be a start in circumstances far from ideal.
4. Employment. Unemployment rates are often highest among the urban poor, and while some people find themselves in poverty after losing a job, the chronically poor are unemployed primarily because they are unprepared. Small businesses and social enterprises in poor urban areas are crucial in creating employment for those ready and eager to work but unable to find it, and fostering an entrepreneurial environment where more will be inclined to do what it takes to land steady, fulfilling work.
5. Health. You and I inherently understand the sky-high costs of health care, which is why the benefits package that comes with a potential job is a significant consideration. For the reasons above and more, health problems that would be inconveniences for us in fact constitute crises for the urban poor. Many Christian community development organizations start health clinics to fill this gap, often depending on volunteers from the medical profession as well as donations, offset a bit by modest fees charged to patients.
6. Security. Poor urban areas are notoriously dangerous, and many residents would argue that the police have done more to hinder security in some cases than to protect them. Racial profiling is real, and even for the city police departments and officers with the best intentions, budgets are often so tight they are prohibited from timely responses in the worst areas. Neighborhood crime watches and other community coalitions can go a long way, Perkins says, but ultimately what matters is developing the next generation and exposing them to non-destructive alternatives.
7. Recreation. There’s far more to life than work, and many of us underestimate the importance of rest, exercise and fun. Whereas busyness may keep us from these things, urban environments are often loud, chaotic and tense. Whether it’s basketball or Girl Scouts, giving kids and teenagers healthy ways to spend their time could pay enormous dividends.
8. Beauty. If what we want for ourselves and for the urban poor isn’t just more money or more stuff but abundant life, we need to consider the importance of aesthetics. Many poor neighborhoods don’t have a lot of green space, and the arts are often neglected. Community gardens that relieve neighborhoods of the eyesores of empty lots and invite neighborhood participation are one idea. Programs giving kids the opportunity to explore the arts like painting, music, and acting can help kids and adults alike recognize the beauty that already exists and the capacity they have to be creators.
This list certainly isn’t intended to be exhaustive. What else would you add?
[Part 4 of 6 in my review of the Seek Social Justice study from the Heritage Foundation and WORLD Magazine]
The fourth section of the study is called Restoring Dignity and Purpose: The Importance of Work, and focuses, as the title suggests, on the importance of employment in any healthy and just society. The focus in the video is on the importance of work specifically for men getting out of prison, but the principles apply broadly.
They rightly point out that according to the Bible, all of us are made in the image of God, the Creator, and that doing something creative and productive with our lives is part of what we were created to do. Work is not a curse or a punishment; it's a good thing. That's a pretty important reminder, and has profound implications if we really believe it. So the question of vocation arises: what has God designed us to do, for his glory and for the common good? This is a good question for all of us to consider from time to time - not just those who are working to get back on their feet after time in prison.

The core message in this section is that whereas welfare programs (and the prison system, for that matter) dehumanize people, strip people of their God-given dignity, and instill an attitude of passivity, work does just the opposite. It gives people meaning, it benefits families and communities, and it allows people to give back to society rather than just taking, taking, taking.
It struck me while working through the study that it's all too easy to go to one extreme or another. This study is clearly written from a certain political perspective, but no one's immune from this tendency, I don't think.
It's easy for progressives to judge anti-welfare conservatives as heartless and greedy, or for conservatives to blame progressives for pushing top-down programs that dehumanize, rob dignity, and further cement people in cycles of poverty. It gets pretty ugly, really. The Bible doesn't do that. The Bible upholds the dignity of work, of everyone doing their part, but it doesn't allow for the pursuit of wealth to go unchecked -- even motives are scrutinized.
Consider this perspective from the book of Proverbs: "[G]ive me neither poverty nor riches, but give me only my daily bread. Otherwise, I may have too much and disown you and say, 'Who is the LORD?' Or I may become poor and steal, and so dishonor the name of my God." Neither poverty nor riches are held up as the ideal; both can be tremendously dangerous and destructive for individuals, families, and societies. Rather, we ask God for enough: enough to provide for our families, enough to share with our neighbors, enough to care for those in need. I don't sense that many of us live from this perspective of enough, honestly. It doesn't come naturally to me, though I believe it to be biblical. And it's certainly not the principle our economy is built upon.
Okay, deep breath...

I realize I might be stepping on some toes here, but capitalism and free markets as we know them today are not held up in the Bible as examples to follow. They may be the best options we currently have and they may certainly embody important biblical principles, but they are not divinely inspired. Have I lost you yet? As Christians, the responsibility to be good stewards in all areas of life, to love our neighbor, to do justice - these must take precedence over every ideology and philosophy and system, including free markets, whenever they come into conflict. I wish the study would have gone so far as to say so explicitly.
While the authors do concede the importance of political and economic systems guarding against abuses that happen because we are fallen, greedy people (as the roots of our current economic debacle make quite clear, incidentally), it is mentioned almost as an aside and the emphasis is overwhelmingly placed on free markets remaining free. Free markets create jobs, which create wealth, which creates dignity, which allows people to help others. I agree that markets have a lot of potential and in some cases, they do actually produce these desirable results.
Free market capitalism has created wealth with remarkable success and efficiency. No doubt about that. But social justice has by no means been its strong point. It wasn't designed to be.
The maximization of profit, for instance, is one of capitalism's foundational principles. But if you follow the principle to its logical conclusion, it undermines precisely the positive things that this study claims work creates. Do you see what I mean? Would it be too much for someone to challenge the dehumanization that government welfare programs cause AND challenge the dehumanizing and unjust ramifications on large segments of society by the principle of the maximization of profit?
It's rare to hear such a consistent argument, though, perhaps because neither side of the dominant political debate finds such consistency convenient. But even better than consistent denouncements, I'd love to see more positive alternatives to current dehumanizing status quos in both business and government. I've touched on that in earlier parts of the series, and I am hopeful that through this curriculum many more 'free-market' Christians will be part of such positive alternatives. If we're truly more concerned with justice than with a certain political or economic ideology, it seems like a no-brainer, though admittedly much easier said than done.
Now, I'm not picking on work or on capitalism. I repeat: I AM NOT PICKING ON WORK OR ON CAPITALISM. Work is good and capitalism has great potential to address poverty. Faithful, discerning followers of Christ and compassionate people from all walks of life are experimenting with market-driven solutions to poverty and injustice. These efforts should be applauded and supported. But these innovative, entrepreneurial ones on the front lines will be the first to tell you, I think, that social justice won't happen with business-as-usual. And while this study rightly emphasizes the need for people to be able to find work that promotes dignity and provides the means for providing for family and sharing with neighbor, I'm not sure the vision presented here goes far enough to tackle the weak spots and potentially quite destructive downfalls of capitalism as we know it.
The American Dream is compelling, but it is not the gospel. Jesus didn't come preaching a slightly modified, baptized version of any economic system, be it capitalism or socialism or anarchism or mercantilism or any others. He came preaching the Kingdom, and no man-made economic system can handle the profound implications of that. May God grant us the grace to be faithful stewards, right where we are, with what we have, with who we are. May God grant us the grace to be gracious.