Archives For Costa Rica

A boy looks in the window at Semillas Biblioteca, a library in Diriamba, Nicaragua

During my first two visits to Costa Rica, both of which were way too brief, I became really curious about Costa Rica’s neighbor to the north, Nicaragua. The two countries share a big border, and since CR is comparatively wealthy and Nicaragua is comparatively poor, this creates a bit of tension between the two, as you can imagine (not that we in the US know anything about tensions with a poor neighboring country).

So when I went back to Costa Rica last year to spend two months with my friends at the Association for Development through Education, I was sure to schedule a bus trip to Nicaragua. I lined up visits and interviews for three potential magazine story ideas, not sure which, if any, would ever be published.

Pastor Francisco outside his church

One was a visit to La Chureca in the capital city of Managua, the largest garbage dump in Central America. There, a pastor who was a friend of a friend of a friend walked me through a labyrinth of plastic and sheet metal and introduced me to men and women who were part of a church he pastored until recently.

On another day I caught a minibus to the nearby town of Diriamba, where some friends of a friend had started that town’s first public library to nurture an appreciation for learning and reading and to provide young people with a safe place to grow up. The visits to both La Chureca and Diriamba were humbling and encouraging, as I witnessed Christians serving those in need and doing so faithfully, without a whole lot of fanfare.

But for various reasons the magazine idea that in fact came to fruition was a visit to Hogar Belén, a home for disabled and abandoned children just outside Managua, and part of a nonprofit called Mustard Seed Communities. It has been published in the May/June edition of PRISM, and the PDF is available here.

A boy at the clinic at Hogar Belén

I’m glad this story came together because I think it demonstrates a striking contrast between prevailing views of what is considered success — even in church and ministry among the poor — and what Jesus has to say about serving “the least of these” with mustard seed-like faith.

The disabled, abandoned children of Hogar Belén don’t need any more of the CEO-type leaders that our evangelical culture is intent on churning out. And they certainly don’t need any more egotistical political leaders who put up year-round Christmas Trees to remind citizens of all they have to celebrate because of him. My hunch (or hypothesis) is that what the children of Hogar Belén have found is in fact what Christ calls each of us uniquely and all of us collectively to be. But you’ll need to read the article to see what that is. Then I’d really love to hear your thoughts.

Last year I spent a couple of months in Costa Rica, in a community near the epicenter of an earthquake from a little over a year before. I’d first visited the community of San Rafael de Vara Blanca in the spring of 2009 with classmates from the School of Leadership and Development at Eastern University. In lieu of a final exam for our Disaster Relief and Mitigation class, we arranged to visit an actual place coping with the effects of a disaster, and I think it’s safe to say we learned more during the course of that week than we would have learned taking a test (in other words: pedagogy matters, teachers!). I chronicled our class’s experiences here, here, here, here, and here.

Our connection with San Rafael was our classmate and friend Tomas, who had lived in the community as a kid. He has since returned with his wife, kids and a small but dedicated team to start the Association for Development through Education to help rebuild the community — starting with education — and to prepare community members to be able to respond to future disasters both near and far. Coming out of my experience living between volcanoes in the jungle of Costa Rica with the ADE team, I wrote a piece that was just published in Flourish Magazine. Please read it, add your comments, and pass it on.

Over the past few years I’ve watched with interest as Latin America and the Middle East have become more and more connected. Most famously, perhaps, is the relationship between Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran. These two heads of state would seemingly have little in common, but it appears that their shared distaste for the United States (and “the Westâ€? more generally)  is plenty for them to build on. Obviously understanding the power of provocative political theater, for a few years now the two nations have been connected by a Caracas-Tehran flight, which seems far more political than practical.

But these inter-continental connections don’t stop with Venezuela and Iran. Over the past couple of months and seemingly out of nowhere, a wave of Latin American countries have begun to publicly recognize Palestine as a sovereign state: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Guyana, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Suriname, Uruguay and Venezuela have all issued a statement in one form or another. Colombia stands out for its decision not to recognize a Palestinian state, perhaps to ensure that the sizable $465 in foreign assistance it is due to receive from the United States is not put in jeopardy.

Looking ahead, keep an eye on the third Summit of South American and Arab Countries, scheduled for February 12-16 in Lima, Peru. It is described as “a forum for policy coordination between countries in these two regions, and a mechanism for cooperation in the field of economy, culture, education, science and technology preservation of the environment, tourism and other topics relevant to the sustainable development of those countries and contribute to world peace.�

The lesson that’s clear in all of this, I’d suggest, is that Latin America cannot be minimized or ignored any longer on the world stage. Given the widespread protests throughout the Middle East over the past couple of weeks, it will be especially interesting to see what bearing these Middle Eastern-Latin American ties will have on the world once the the tear gas clouds have dissipated, the dust has settled, and perhaps, new governments have taken power.

[Photo credit: ISNA/Amir Pourmand]

This is where I live

March 31, 2010 — 1 Comment

Several weeks ago, shortly after I arrived here in San Rafael, Tomas introduced me to the pastor of the local church before one of the services. That morning during his sermon, the pastor called on me by name several times, which I suppose was a way to make sure I was paying attention. I’d nod vehemently and perhaps mutter an amen. The following Sunday he did the same thing, four or five times. One of those times, he went so far as to ask if I’d do the sermon some upcoming Sunday.

Yesterday, Palm Sunday, turned out to be that day.

In preparation, I read and re-read and re-re-read the biblical account of Jesus’ triumphal entry, but nothing was really coming together for me, and in the end I landed on Isaiah 53, which is fitting for Holy Week, albeit more of a Good Friday passage.

The theme of the chapter, as you may know, is the woundedness of Christ as foretold by the prophet Isaiah. It’s a brutal passage, really, full of words like suffering, pain, pierced, crushed, wounded, oppressed, afflicted, a lamb to the slaughter, and cut off from the land of the living. But it’s also a wonderful passage, especially because in it is the tremendously good news that by his wounds we are healed.

I spoke in the sermon about our brokenness, our woundedness, our sin. It’s pretty obvious we’re in need of healing, if you take the time to stop and think about it. When we do our own thing, when we play by our own rules – when we wander off like sheep, as Isaiah puts it – things get pretty screwed up really quickly. And there’s generally quite a lot of collateral damage.

Not to get all sociologically insightful on you, but as people who have been nurtured in a society that highly esteems personal liberty and individual rights, I think we often make the costly error of reading the Bible as if it were addressed primarily to isolated individuals having their ‘quiet times’ with God. But taking a step back, remember that the Old Testament books were addressed to the people Israel, and the epistles of the New Testament (at the very least) were addressed to churches.

With all of that in mind, when Isaiah writes that “by his wounds we are healed” it follows that he actually does mean we. There’s a communal element there, which is really good news because of that collateral damage I mentioned earlier, which we have all undoubtedly experienced. Our woundedness has everything to do with the fact that we interact with people who, like us, are broken and sinful.

So the question I posed to the church, and the question I pose to you, is this: what will we do with our wounds and the wounds we have inflicted – knowingly or not – on others? Will we hide them, pretending that we’re mostly healthy people, that we’re not wounded and that we do not wound others? We might try for a while, but we won’t succeed for long.

The tremendously good news, then, is that Jesus – by whose wounds we are healed – didn’t come for those who had their act together. He came for the notorious sinners, the ones who seem to fail at hiding their brokenness, the ones who were just waiting for someone to offer them a new and better way of life, to offer them healing.

In the gospels, many of these notorious sinners turned out to be tax collectors, those who abused their positions of power to achieve great monetary gain with no apparent concern for their dismal social standing in street corner public opinion polls. Here in Costa Rica there’s a great word for just this sort of thing. The word is chorizo, defined formally as a “willful action or act of corruption to gain public funds.” One who engages in chorizo, then, is a chorizero.

So in my sermon I talked about the tax-collector-turned-disciple Matthew, a chorizero if there ever was one. Jesus called Matthew to follow, and next thing you know, they’re eating dinner at Matthew’s place, along with a whole motley crew of chorizeros and other scoundrels. The Pharisees, professionals at hiding their own woundedness, took issue with Jesus’ apparent lack of discretion. To which Jesus responded that he had not come for those who had it all together, but for those in desperate need of healing. So that’s either really good news or really bad news, depending on whether we’re honest about our wounds.

But even if we’re honest about our wounds and we accept the healing Jesus offers, the pain tends to linger for a while, and we’re often left with scars, in some cases permanently. These spiritual and relational scars, like all the miscellaneous physical scars we carry around on our bodies from years of wear and tear, give us opportunities to tell the stories. Not just stories of being wounded and of wounding others, but of being healed, and even of being used by God as instruments of healing in the lives of others.

And on that note I closed the sermon, reminding the church and myself that God does not bless us and heal us just for our own sakes. He blesses us and heals us so that we in turn may bless others, so that we might be instruments of shalom – undoing, by his grace, a bit of the collateral damage all around us.