Bonhoeffer on visible signs of the cross
One of the books I decided to read this year for Lent is Dietrich Bonhoeffer's classic on Christian community, Life Together. This was my fifth time reading it, if memory serves me right. Each time I'm struck by something different, and each time I'm both challenged and encouraged.
I'll just share one passage that stood out to me this time around. It seems to me that our spiritual lives and our churches are to a large extent shaped by cultural norms like individualism and efficiency in significant if subtle ways, and our understanding of faithfulness (or success) in those areas take shape accordingly. I think that's concerning. Consider Bonhoeffer's take on "interruptions" and what Christian community and service really mean:
We must be ready to allow ourselves to be interrupted by God. God will be constantly crossing our paths and cancelling our plans by sending us people with claims and petitions. We may pass them by, preoccupied with our more important tasks, as the priest passed by the man who had fallen among thieves, perhaps -- reading the Bible. When we do that we pass by the visible sign of the Cross raised athwart our path to show us that, not our way, but God's way must be done. It is strange fact that Christians and even ministers frequently consider their work so important and urgent that they will allow nothing to disturb them. They think they are doing God a service in this, but actually they are disdaining God's "crooked yet straight path" (Gottfried Arnold). They do not want a life that is crossed and balked. But it is part of the discipline of humility that we must not spare our hand where it can perform a service and that we do not assume that our schedule is our own to manage, but allow it to be arranged by God.
In the monastery his vow of obedience to the abbot deprives the monk of the right to dispose of his own time. In evangelical community life, free service to one's brother takes the place of the vow. Only where hands are not too good for deeds of love and mercy in everyday helpfulness can the mouth joyfully and convincingly proclaim the message of God's love and mercy.
- Life Together (HarperOne, 1954), pp. 99-100.
What can Western Christians in the twenty-first century do to pinpoint and correct the ways in which individualism and efficiency have undermined our ability to proclaim and embody God's love?
[Image credit: "Parable of the Good Samaritan" by Jan Wijnants, oil on canvas, 1670 via Wikimedia Commons]
Radical Together
Last fall I shared some thoughts on David Platt’s first book, Radical: Taking Back Your Faith From the American Dream. In the book, Platt urges readers to consider the ways in which the gospel is at odds with a materialistic, narcissistic American way of life, and to commit to living ‘radical’ lives for Christ.
He has since written a sequel called Radical Together: Unleashing the People of God for the Purpose of God. If you've read the first one (or if you’ve read John Piper’s Let the Nations be Glad or Don’t Waste Your Life, for that matter) it's likely that nothing in Radical Together will come as a surprise. Rather, Platt takes the themes from Radical and explores the implications for congregations rather than individuals. He seeks to show “how a right understanding of the church fuels radical obedience among Christians.” Churches, he rightly argues, aren’t meant to be consumer-oriented bubbles; instead, each Christian is to be equipped for the work of the church both locally and globally. This is an important affirmation of the historic Christian belief in the “priesthood of all believers,” and a critique of what is too often the norm: inward facing churches, full of consumers of religious goods and services, administered by professionals.
Platt writes about the difficulty in letting go of good programs in order to channel a church’s resources and attention more purposely based on what we believe to be true about the mission of God in Scripture. In the case of the church he pastors in Birmingham, Alabama, that means a particular focus on northern India. While understandably encouraging Christians and churches to take seriously the great needs overseas, I wish he would have done more to affirm both local and global ministry as equally vital expressions of Christian faith. As it is, one is left with the impression that the further away our neighbors are, the more worthwhile it is to seek to love them. I know from experience that even in churches with vibrant global ministries, local ministry does not happen automatically, and I suspect Platt's readers would be led to replace one kind of lopsided ministry with another. Also, though he affirms the importance of serving the poor, he particularly emphasizes sharing the gospel (verbally) with the “unreached.” Again, the influence of Piper is evident, though as a call for holistic ministry, I think it falls a bit short.
On the whole Platt’s book is a welcome critique of easy-breezy suburban religion and, not unlike Dietrich Bonhoeffer at a different time and place, it’s a new call for Christians to consider the cost of discipleship. And it’s a good reminder that “God doesn’t involve us in his global plan because he needs us; he involves us because he loves us.” It would simply be a shame to miss out.
I received this book for free from WaterBrook Multnomah Publishing Group for this review. The introduction to the book is available free here, and also check out other resources including videos at the WaterBrook Multnomah site.

