Tim Høiland
14Mar/07Off

Safety, Risk, and Backwards Lies.

I thought I was taking a risk, heading off to Cambodia for three months. After spending my formative years in a third world country, I had gotten a little too comfortable with my suburban American life, and it was time to go. It was time to go far, to leave the cave and regain my sight.

So on August 30 in the middle of the night I set out down the long tunnel at Newark International Airport, away from family and friends and familiarity, and walked willfully, yet nervously, into the arms of the great unknown.

At the time it seemed like truly risky business.

But this was before I got there and realized that the time of preparation before the trip was ten times more stressful than actually being there, and before I was slapped in the face with the realization that the idea of safety as we know it is largely a figment of our imagination.

Within the first few weeks of my time in Cambodia, I heard from a friend of mine back home who was mugged by my next-door neighbors, the ones who’d always be hanging out on the front steps when I’d get home from work. Then came news of the tragic Amish school shooting, which made front page headlines in the Cambodian newspaper, along with a map of the area that showed the school just a few miles from my parents’ house.

So there I was in Cambodia (which is not necessarily synonymous with safety in the first place), hearing accounts of senseless violence from “home sweet home,� along with reports of a military coup in the country to the west and a typhoon just to the east.

And in a way, this was nothing new. I did, after all, grow up in Guatemala, where the fact that my first fifteen years were spent in a nation engaged in civil war seemed normal to me. And I did travel to Kenya in the summer of 2004, just days after the State Department issued a warning, urging Americans to stay out if they knew what was best for them.

If your instinct is to tell me that the kind of thing I am advocating is analogous to walking across an LA freeway with a blindfold over my eyes, I’d challenge you to reconsider. There is a big difference between the risk of venturing into parts of the world or parts of your city commonly (often ignorantly and wrongly) deemed unsafe, and the risk of jumping off cliffs into quarries when anyone can tell you this has been a recipe for all too many needless deaths.

While both kinds of activities are risks, one is senseless, and one is right. Both are risky because you never know what will happen. But stepping out of your comfort zone is something God calls all of us to, and it is right because it is sometimes only by venturing into the unknown that we can come back home with new eyes, able to see the often disturbing (but no less real) truth that we don’t have control over much of anything, no matter where we are. And when we go to these places, the idea that here is safe and there is risky will be exposed for the backwards lie that it is, along with the lie that we, and those like us, are mostly saints, while they, whoever they are, are mostly demons.

There may have been a time when it was less crucial to know anything about the outside world. But today the outside world has come inside, to the point that there is really no longer any inside and outside, but rather only side-by-side.

So, as people called to love our neighbors, we’d do well to get to know them. And you just can’t do that in a cave.

6Mar/07Off

A reverie concerning life and death (and everything in between)

I once heard Rich Mullins say that people called him morose because a lot of his work focused on the topic of death. He responded that all through history, Christians have looked forward to death because of the assurance of what lies beyond, and that maybe we now have it backwards in wanting to hold on to the here and now.

* * * * *

Our bodies are broken and we are wasting away. I'm reminded of this now and then on Sunday mornings. I shake hands with the greeters - wrinkled, weathered hands. We're asked to pray for people in hospice and for the families of those recently 'gone home to be with the Lord.' My pastor is right, and so is David Crowder, when both of them say that everybody wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die.

Not only does nobody want to die, but nobody seems to want to even think about dying, which means few do so until so doing is inescapable. Which is of course what it ends up being for all of us eventually, in one way or another, and often repeatedly.

This is all sobering to consider, as one who is young and vibrant, with so much life ahead of me, and so many untapped dreams and longings.

And if I'm prone to feel alone now, how much more alone will I feel years from now if/when my wife dies before I do? Because all of us who don't get divorced, don't get married, or do get married but don't die first, will be widows and widowers, and that amounts to a lot of us. Further, we'll all see parents and siblings die, as well as friends, both close and distant.

Death, save the rapture, is inevitable. Remind us that this life is the prelude and this body is a tent.

We're tadpoles who can't quite fathom froghood, though any five-year-old knows that froghood is what tadpoles are made for. We're fetuses in the womb, with no idea that there's light, or air, or food, or sex, or trees, or sunsets, or death - and yet fetuses are not ultimately made to be fetuses.

We were made to be born, to live, to die, and then to really live.

Atheists say that believers who have their heads in the cloud-world of eternity are actually threats to the here and now in much the same way that suicide bombers are threats, because to believers it's all the same if the world goes to hell - today or forever - just as long as they (and by they, I mean we) get out, and get to heaven.

I can't blame atheists for feeling this way, to be honest, because there are many who at least appear to live life with this sort of a mindset. "The environment is the least of our worries," they say. "It is arrogant to suggest that man can ruin God's creation. He won't let it come to that." Or "It's really too bad, the poor and sick and starving, but we need to put things in perspective. Our body is a tent. It's the soul that matters. Don't worry about the physical; focus on the spiritual."

But I wonder if these people, these believers, are reading their Bibles. It's cool if the atheists aren't, but you'd think believers would be.

There's got to be more to it than this. Do You really want us tracking mud all over Your house, recognizing after all, that we won't live here forever? Or could it be true that You've put this longing for eternity in our hearts so we don't get comfortable, so we don't kick our shoes off and zone out in front of the tube when there's work to be done, but instead so we, with our eyes on You and our hearts in eternity, will join You in the kingdom work You are doing here and now?

Have You written eternity on our hearts to keep us from caring about our world, or, to get us to care so much about it that we're committed to serving others, lovingly, sacrificially, uncomfortably, as aliens? Could it be that the only way we can truly be for the world is to be pilgrims just passing through, set apart, unstained, holy? Is this why You tell us that Your will for our lives is our sanctification?

Lord, these are big questions.

Death, from all of our earthly experience (which, it could be said, is all the experience we have had), is completely and totally final. And it is often tragic. We sense it when watching movies: the bloody knife, the smoking gun, the crumpled body at the base of the skyscraper, the lungs that breathe their last. Tears; lots of tears. And silence.

I don't think You'd have us take death lightly, but neither would You have us become overwhelmed by it, forgetting what lies beyond, forever. For even if our interpretation of our experience tells us one thing, our faith tells us another, and while this may be tough to come to terms with, we are, after all, people of faith first, recognizing that we see only in part. But I'm not sure there needs to be a big chasm here between faith and experience. I think most of us can say that even our experience hints at something more. It hints that one day we will no longer be swimming in a pond without legs, but we will sprout legs and hop out onto solid ground. And we will not always be cooped up in this dark cave with this dang umbilical cord, but one day we will, for whatever reason, have a belly button, and we will see light, eat food, drink wine, breathe air, watch the sunset. And when we sprout legs and breathe air we will know that while we were indeed real tadpoles and real fetuses, we are now more real than we ever knew possible.

Give us a perspective on death that fills us with hope and joy, and give us a passion for life that fills the world with the same. When I look at Your Son, Jesus, I see one who undoubtedly had his eyes on eternity and yet was present and alive in the nitty gritty of life.

This is real life, all of it. And when we catch a glimpse of it, we won't have to choose between eternal life on earth and eternal life in heaven. And neither will the one who, until now, called himself an atheist.